The Economist's latest print edition has annoyed me, I hope they are afraid. They have dubbed this entirely bloodless and mostly happy occasion as "Thailand's dangerous coup." "The land of smiles is once again the land of coups". Ugh, unfair.
They make some valid and important points: what if Indonesia's army were to take over in the name of democracy, what authority does Thailand have to encourage democracy in Burma, what if this coup won't end?
"Dominoe effect": The Coups-For-Democracy Edition.
We're already asking these questions here in Bangkok, these are concerns shared by everyone else here. Today, for example, a small demonstration of anti-coup activists was broken up peacefully outside Paragon (An anti-coup rally outside a luxury mall - The Consumerist Revolution, lookit the freedoms we seek to protect.)
But, I am annoyed because it seems as though the international community are forgetting Thailand's reality. What happened to international condemnation for Thaksin as he repeatedly found himself on the
Human Rights Watch, expelled foreign journalists who had contrary opinions of him, manipulated legislation for private gain, went on a mass execution frenzy for Burmese drug dealers, and showed absolutely zero understanding of Muslim insurgents in the south? When the White House says this coup is "unjustifiable", it makes me think they haven't read any newspapers lately.
I am largely anti-coup and upset at the symbolic implications of it, when considering what Thailand stands for in this region. I like to beleive that democracies sort themselves out because it puts power at the hands of the people. I believe that, given time, processes and institutions should fix themselves because its the citizens who determine the future of the country. Theoretically.
But. I am not pleased with the statements from many international leaders and much of the foreign press. I know it is their duty to condemn military occuption, you cannot authorise these things in other countries and I do not think they should. However, I find that they completely disregard this country's situation, these are statements made in isolation without consideration to whats been going on for the past one year here. It is a generic "coups are bad, we do not approve" reponse. I expected more from you, Kofi! Are we not seeing, for the first time in history, a situation in which a coup was necessary?
The FACT is that Thaksin was going to be re-elected in October because all populist vote-buying leaders come back again and again until they become dictators - haven't we learnt this from Latin America? The situation here was getting worse, we were on the verge of something horrific. Thailand found itself between a rock and a hard place: what do you do when the democatic system does NOT right itself? Thaksin, as we all know, has a complete disregard for democracy. So, either we bring back an undemocratic leader through democratic means who would ruin the country over the next 5 years, or we execute an undemocratic event to "restore democracy."
Though I hate the idea of this military occupation and the political scientist in me is cringing (but lovin' it), I definitely understand why we are in this absurd situation and certainly believe that it is justifiable,
in this case. So long as it remains as peaceful as it has.
And if there had to be a coup - what a fantastic coup this is! This
yellow-ribbon, rose-in-barrel, smiling-soldier, democracy-loving coup. This Pooj-saw-no-tanks coup. This is-there-really-a-coup coup.